AI Governance
Governance is the artifact you hand a risk committee, not a policy nobody can evidence.
Who this is for
Risk, compliance, and governance owners mapping AI systems to a framework.
What you should be able to do
Map a deployment to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 control by control, with evidence.
Career ladder
The titles this track maps onto. Levels differ between companies. The useful part is the direction, and what each step adds to the one before it.
- Compliance Analyst
- AI Governance Specialist
- AI Risk Manager
- Head of AI Governance
- Chief Risk / AI Officer
Tech stack
What the work is actually done with. Grouped by the job each tool does, so the list reads as a system rather than a pile of names.
- Frameworks
- NIST AI RMFISO/IEC 42001ISO/IEC 27001EU AI Act
- Regulated
- HIPAAGDPRFedRAMPSOC 2
- Practice
- Model cardsRisk registerEvidence packsApproval workflow
The delivery flow
The order the work actually happens in. Each step is where a decision gets made and written down, not a chapter heading.
- System register
- Ownership + accountability
- Risk classification
- Control mapping
- Evidence collection
- Approval workflow
- Periodic review
- Audit pack
Reference repository structure
A starting layout for this track. The directories are the ones that get added late and hurt. Decisions, evals, policy, lineage. Promoted to the top level where they are visible.
ai-governance/ ├── register/ # every AI system, with a named owner ├── risk/ │ ├── classification.md # tiering criteria, applied consistently │ └── register.csv ├── controls/ │ ├── nist-ai-rmf/ # mapped control by control │ └── iso-42001/ ├── evidence/ # the artifact an auditor actually reads │ └── <system>/<control>/ ├── approvals/ # who signed, when, on what basis ├── model-cards/ └── reviews/ # scheduled, with dates that are kept
Reading path
9 published guides on this track. Every one is a live page on this site. Nothing here is a placeholder.
- AI Compliance in 2026: HIPAA, FedRAMP, and GDPR for ML Systems
- A Phased Governance Rollout for AI Agents: Crawl, Walk, Run
- AI Governance for the Enterprise: A Practical Framework
- AI for Healthcare in Africa: HIPAA Meets NDPR
- AWS Security Audit Kit, Free, Citadel Cloud Management
- Audit Trails for AI Agents: Making Every Action Attributable
- FedRAMP Cloud Services, Compliant Solutions
- Mapping AI Agent Deployments to ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF
- SOC 2 Type II for SaaS Products: The Developer's Playbook
Reference implementations
Citadel’s open-source repositories for this track. Terraform modules, MCP servers, and reference architectures you can read, fork, and run. Apache/MIT licensed; check each repository for its terms.
- GitHubmulti-industry-ai-assistantHIPAA/SOX/OSHA AI assistant for Healthcare, Finance, Oil & Gas. Plugin architecture, PII detection, NLI faithfulness validation, audit logging. FastAPI + Python.multi-industry-ai-assistant on github.com (external site, opens in a new tab)
- GitHubterraform-aws-security-baselineAWS security baseline module with GuardDuty, Security Hub, Config, CloudTrail, Macie, and Access Analyzerterraform-aws-security-baseline on github.com (external site, opens in a new tab)
- GitHubai-agent-soc-triageAI-powered SOC alert triage agent with MITRE ATT&CK classification, severity scoring, and automated response playbooksai-agent-soc-triage on github.com (external site, opens in a new tab)
Primary sources
The standards, framework documents, and vendor references this track is built against. Go here when you need the authoritative wording rather than a summary. In a security review or an audit, the source is what counts.
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework (external site, opens in a new tab)
- ISO/IEC 42001 AI management systems (external site, opens in a new tab)
- ISO/IEC 27001 information security (external site, opens in a new tab)
- EU AI Act full text (external site, opens in a new tab)
- NIST SP 800-53 security controls (external site, opens in a new tab)
- FedRAMP (external site, opens in a new tab)